HomeCirculationVol. 146, No. 14Shark Fin Electrocardiogram in the Intensive Care Unit Free AccessCase ReportPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessCase ReportPDF/EPUBShark Fin Electrocardiogram in the Intensive Care Unit Bin Zhang, PhD, Zhao-Wei Yin, MD and Wenbiao Chen, PhD Bin ZhangBin Zhang https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7590-3752 Department of Cardiovascular Disease and Clinical Experimental Center, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, Guangdong, China (B.Z.). *B. Zhang and Z.-W. Yin contributed equally. Search for more papers by this author , Zhao-Wei YinZhao-Wei Yin https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9051-1426 Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China (Z.-W.Y.). *B. Zhang and Z.-W. Yin contributed equally. Search for more papers by this author and Wenbiao ChenWenbiao Chen Correspondence to: Wenbiao Chen, PhD, No. 38, Jinglong Construction Road, Shenzhen, 518109, Guangdong, China. Email E-mail Address: [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1028-6319 Department of Respiratory Medicine, People’s Hospital of Longhua, The Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China (W.C.). Search for more papers by this author Originally published3 Oct 2022https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.062034Circulation. 2022;146:1099–1102ECG ChallengeA 54-year-old woman was admitted to the intensive care unit with septic shock induced by intraabdominal infection. An initial physical examination revealed a body temperature of 38.6°C, a blood pressure of 82/56 mm Hg, a pulse rate of 109 beats per minute, and a respiratory rate of 26 breaths/minute. At admission, a 12-lead ECG was performed (Figure 1). Serum troponin I level was 2.02 ng/mL (normal value <0.10 ng/mL) and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide) level was 5300 pg/mL (normal value <450 pg/mL). What are the important findings on the ECG? What is the most likely diagnosis? How would you manage the patient?Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 1. Initial ECG at admission.Please turn the page to read the diagnosis.Response to ECG ChallengeThe initial ECG showed diffuse ST-segment elevations in leads I, II, III, aVF, and V3 through V6 (Figure 1), which suggested a diagnosis of anterior and inferior wall ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction. However, ST-segment depressions in leads aVR and V1 were inconsistent with that diagnosis. The prominent ST-segment depression in aVR might reflect a ST-segment elevation in lead aVR, which faces the apical and inferolateral regions. Diffuse ST-segment elevations (most prominent in leads II and aVR) might reflect extensively distributed wall motion abnormalities centered around the apex, which extended beyond the perfusion territory of any single coronary artery. The ST-segment depression in lead V1 indicated that wall motion abnormalities did not involve the right ventricular anterior region and the right paraseptal region faced by lead V1.1,2 The V3 through V6 leads showed giant R waves (amplitude ≥1 mV) that merged with markedly elevated ST segments, which formed a triangular morphology known as the same configuration called shark-fin sign and lambda-wave pattern (Figure 1). This electrocardiographic presentation is characteristic of ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction, where the QRS complex, the ST segment, and the T wave are fused in a unique complex. Although acute coronary ischemia is traditionally associated with a shark-fin sign, this unusual tracing is also occasionally found in takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TTC), associated with hemodynamic instability and shock.3 In addition, the rise in serum troponin I level was disproportionately lower than expected for the degree of left ventricular contractile impairment and the NT-proBNP level was much higher than typically observed in a myocardial infarction, which suggested a high degree of acute left ventricular dilation and myocardial stretch. The ECG and cardiac biomarkers provided a clue that this patient might have TTC. Confirmation of TTC diagnosis requires coronary angiography and left ventriculography. In this patient, coronary angiography revealed normal coronary arteries (Figure 2A and 2B) and left ventriculography showed systolic apical ballooning in the left ventricle (Figure 2C and 2D) with a low left ventricular ejection fraction of 38%, consistent with a diagnosis of TTC. TTC was the final diagnosis in this patient.Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 2. Emergent coronary angiography and left ventriculography. A and B, Emergent coronary angiography showed no evidence of obstructive or spastic coronary disease. C and D, Left ventriculography revealed systolic apical ballooning in the apical region of the left ventricle.The patient was treated in an intensive care unit with a trachea cannula and mechanical ventilation. She was given empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics, intravenous fluids, and vasopressor support. The empiric antimicrobial therapy was replaced once the underlying pathogen was recognized and antimicrobial sensitivities were established. Systolic apical ballooning in the left ventricle was treated with levosimendan, a noncatecholamine inotrope that does not increase myocyte cyclic adenosine monophosphate or oxygen consumption. Six days later, the disease had abated and the ECG (Figure 3) showed resolution of ST-segment elevations in leads I, II, III, aVF, and V2 through V6; T-wave flatness in leads I, II, III, aVR, aVL, aVF, V5, and V6; T-wave inversion in leads V1 through V4; and mild QT prolongation. A repeat ultrasonic cardiogram 5 weeks after discharge showed resolution of left ventricular systolic function (left ventricular ejection fraction, 59%).Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure 3. ECG after resolution.TTC is characterized by systolic dysfunction typically localized in the apical aspect (81.7%) and less frequently localized in the midventricular aspect (14.6%), basal aspect (2.2%), or focal aspect (1.5%) of the left ventricle. The most accepted hypothesis to explain how TTC arises is an elevation in circulating catecholamines and stress hormones, typically related to physical or emotional stress. Sepsis, a state of severe physical stress, can raise catecholamine levels, which activates the central autonomic nervous system and causes calcium overload in cardiac myocytes, leading to stunning of the myocardium and precipitation of cardiomyopathy. The rather specific ECG changes in TTC are T-wave inversion, often deep and widespread, and substantial QT prolongation, usually developing 24 to 48 hours after the onset of symptoms or the precipitating stressful trigger. ST-segment elevation involving precordial leads is seen in ≈40% of cases. In our case, cardiac involvement was associated with sepsis caused by an intraabdominal infection. The shark-fin sign, described in high-level stressors like critical illness, is an uncommon electrocardiographic finding that typically results from the fusion of the QRS complex, ST segment, and T wave. A proposed mechanism of ST-segment elevation in TTC is a mismatch between endo-epicardial wall tension and stretch-activated channel activation, which eventually leads to a transmural repolarization gradient and hence a coved-type ST modification that mimics the ischemic shark-fin sign. Mounting evidence has associated this feature with increased risk of ventricular fibrillation and cardiogenic shock.3In a critically ill patient with shark-fin sign on ECG and septic shock, TTC needs to be considered, and TTC should be included in the differential diagnosis for patients with sepsis and ST elevation that mimics acute anterior ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction.Article InformationSources of FundingNone.Disclosures None.Footnotes*B. Zhang and Z.-W. Yin contributed equally.Circulation is available at www.ahajournals.org/journal/circFor Sources of Funding and Disclosures, see page 1101–1102.Correspondence to: Wenbiao Chen, PhD, No. 38, Jinglong Construction Road, Shenzhen, 518109, Guangdong, China. Email [email protected]com